 |
| Daily Express 13 Sept 2016 page 2: the mainstream media tries to downplay the threat from Jeremy Corbyn by claiming he may be thrown out in a bureaucratic Boundary Commission change to electorial boundaries, reducing the number of MPs in Parliament from 650 to 600. However, as Labour Leader, he could be found another Labour seat in an area with large anti-Jewish immigrant terrorist voters, such as an area of racists who may find his hate speech more appealing than humanists. So there is no room for complacency. The normal policing of hate speech is apparently suspended for "high profile" bigots. The laws against incitement of hatred and racism are never applied fairly to these people from the legal and political classes, who try to either bribe or coerce their way to dictatorship, manipulating fears of immigrants in their constituencies for votes. |
 |
| Daily Express 16 August 2016 page 12: Stephen Pollard reports how "Human Rights Lawyer" Phil Shiner (founder of the law firm "Public Interest Lawyers") used fake evidence from terrorists and Britain haters to prosecute British people at the expense of the British taxpayer. "As is so often the way with those who attack our finest institutions, Mr Shiner was lauded by the liberal establishment as a hero [Sir Jimmy Saville is a another possible example of this sort]. In 2007 at the Law Society Awards, he was garlanded as solicitor of the year for his 'tenacious and courageous commitment to the rights of those for whom access to justice would otherwise be denied.' [In fact all quack lawyers work for hard cash from somebody, so this typical Law Society excuse for what were soon shown to be malicious prosecutions is plainly manipulative, specious, and frankly dishonest.] He was also given the title of Professor of Practice Law by Middlesex University and honorary titles from the London School of Economics (LSE), Warwick, and Kent Universities. ... The judge who headed the £31 million inquiry, Sir Thayne Forbes, later revealed ... Their claims were ... 'Wholly without foundation and entirely the product of deliberate lies, reckless speculation, and ingrained hostility." This is exactly the pseudo-"socialist" mindset of all enemies of democracy, freedom, and humanity, the wolves who win prizes for camouflaging themselves in sheep's clothing and talking dishonest drivel all the time in the media. Shiner was eventually struck off as a lawyer by the British Law Society on 2 February, 2017, and was then PRAISED for making money from persecuting Britain's heroes, by Labour's shadow attorney general Lady Sharmishta Chakrabarti, CBE, who had earlier posed for smug photographs with Phil Shiner (photo below). |
 |
| Above: "Corbyn and his acolytes ... have an ideological hatred of private enterprise" - Daily Express 25 August 2016 page 12 by Leo McKinstry. Ideological hatred of private enterprise is a bigotry: racism, sexism, socialism, fanaticism, fascism, and Nazism. The normal distinctions of "right" and "left" in politics make no sense when applied to dishonest dictators, who are all alike in their paranoia, their fake news, their bigotry and their abuse of genuine critics. |
 |
| Daily Express 25 August 2016 page 12: Leo McKinstry pointed out the dishonest scare tactics used by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn in the Virgin railways "no seats on trains" publicity stunt, which was later exposed as fake news. |
 |
| Tony Blair's anti-democracy "RANT LEFT GRIEVING DAD SEETHING", Daily Express, 18 February 2017, page 5. |
ABOVE: Britain's new Oswald Mosley, an anti-democracy thuggery leader why lied to the people to cause a war in 2002 and then lied again about Brexit destroying the world, now calls for a revolution against democracy in Britain. This article in the 18 February 2017 Daily Express, page 5, shows how distressing and insulting the dishonest Tony Blair has become. Tony Blair is protected by bodyguards as a result of his massive pension and "earnings" while a "peace envoy to the Middle East" since leaving the UK government, and his "police" thugs arrest his critics on trumped up anti-terrorism charges. The man is a menace. Similarly, "Human Rights Lawyer" Phil Shiner made a career and handsome profit out of using faked evidence to persecute British army veterans. It is time that some of these fake, snake-oil selling "Human Rights Lawyers" and "Liberal Politicians" were exposed for hypocrisy and dishonesty by being convicted of fraud and given a jail term. Justice is not being done because these people are supported by anti-democracy terrorist cartels in the BBC TV news and Oxbridge "elitist educated" newspaper journalism. Oswald Mosley, like Blair, was a LABOUR (pseudo-socialist) MP, before he became a hater of democracy and a fascist. Mussolini was a socialist activist when inventing fascism in 1914, and Hitler's National Socialist party set off WWII due to socialist debt which provoked the robbery of the Jews and the anti-national invasions of surrounding nation states! Hitler's first finance minister Hjalmar Schacht simply borrowed money to pay for Hitler's full employment policy of massive military arms factories, the first autobahn, etc.: socialist debt, wage control, price control, and concentration camps with the robbing of Jews, "paid" for socialism. When borrowed money ran out, Hitler invaded his neighbours. (Socialist warmonger.)
As we pointed out in the previous post on anti-democracy Trump-haters in America, the Marxist/socialist drivel mongering objective is Reichstag Fire scare mongering: to suspend democracy on the basis of a fake news event. It is so easy for corrupt journalists to try. They simply report that a Jew-supporting billionaire tried to give secrets to Russia, and this trick gives them the excuse to hate and try to destroy the Jews, capitalism, and progress, just as Nazi radio and newspapers reported that a Jewish conspiracy burned down the Reichstag. Such "fear mongering" gives them the excuse to ban democracy, to impose a police state which claims the truth is "fake news", while they themselves churn out lies masquerading as truth. All of this is 100% relevant to the suppression of the truth by lying thuggery cartels of "journalists", "historians", and "scientists" of civil defence effectiveness and the real effects of nuclear weapons. Let's pray that Trump's revolution defeats the BBC type propaganda, repeated saturation of lying evil that has led to endless suffering.
Further reading on the truth behind the frauds of so-called "Human Rights Lawyers":
The Sun, 13 February 2017, https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2855711/tank-chasing-lawyer-phil-shiner-reported-to-police-by-tory-mp-for-hounding-iraq-heroes/ :
Tank-chasing lawyer Phil Shiner reported to police by Tory MP for hounding Iraq heroes
Former Army officer has written to Met chief Sir Bernard Hogan Howe demanding they investigate the struck-off solicitor
EXCLUSIVE
13th February 2017, 6:00 pm
DISGRACED tank-chasing lawyer Phil Shiner has been reported to the police for hounding Iraq heroes, the Sun can reveal.
Tory MP Johnny Mercer has written to the Metropolitan Police demanding they investigate the solicitor, who was struck off for dishonesty last week.
The former Army officer, who has led the charge against the flawed Iraq Historic Allegations Team (IHAT) says he did not make the decision to call in the cops “lightly”, but Shiner’s behaviour “simply cannot be right.”
Mr Mercer has asked Met chief Sir Bernard Hogan Howe to open an investigation to see if Shiner has “transgressed the boundaries of English Law”.
The IHAT investigations were set up in the last days of the Labour Government in 2010 to look into claims of murder, abuse and torture carried out by British troops.
But it was heavily criticised and more than 1,000 claims were dismissed, with Defence Secretary Michael Fallon announcing it would be closed this summer.
He said Mr Shiner made soldiers’ lives a “misery”, and the solicitors disciplinary tribunal found him guilty of a dozen misconduct charges during a shameful spree that saw him personally pocket millions.
The Shadow Attorney General – one of Jeremy Corbyn’s closest allies - insisted it shouldn’t be used as an excuse to lift European Human Rights rules imposed on the military – as demanded by Mr Fallon.
Speaking to ITV’s Peston on Sunday she said: “I think it’s very sad when a public servant who’s given very good service to the public, when their career ends in disgrace.” [What she presumably means in plain English is, it's very sad for her credibility when her dishonest associates are exposed.]
UPDATE ON WHY ANTI NUCLEAR DETERRENCE BIGOTS CENSOR THEIR OPPONENTS INSTEAD OF ENGAGING IN HONEST DISCUSSIONS: 24 FEBRUARY 2017
There is another analysis of the use of bigotry dressed up as "taking offense at other people's views" by Stephen Pollard out today: This Country Has Been Taken Over by the PC Brigade, Daily Express, 24 February 2017, page 12, which is vital for understanding how and why groupthink "liberal elite"-camouflaged fascists get away with ignoring the substance of the argument (which debunks their agenda of dogmatic Marxism, socialism, or whatever). If you hold a political garbage belief that you cannot honestly defend by reasoned argument, then you act as a bigot by censoring out all alternative, more defensible ideas as being immoral.
This was the way the medieval Catholic Church, the USSR Stalinist's and Goebbels' Nazis propaganda machine worked: they were paranoid, claiming that all their critics were racist infidel, a trick still used by Marxists against Jews and Western capitalists. Socialists claimed they were fighting back against anti-Aryan, or anti-Russian bigotry when they starved, beat and gassed millions. Then concentration camp eugenics was deemed the only way to stop anti-Aryan or anti-Russian "racism". By simplistically and falsely dressing up any criticism as being simply "rude" or "racist", this "shoot the messenger" card was used to protect socialist ideology from reform (rudeness is used by Marxists whenever it suits their agenda to rant and rave and scream, to divert themselves from the task of honest debate, and because someone has been angered or embittered by dogmatic authority doesn't by itself prove their criticisms to be wrong):
"Political correctness has become a poison ... it destroys ordinary people's faith in the system by treating their genuine and decent concerns as somehow immoral. And when people no longer feel that mainstream politics and the system can reflect their values, then they look elsewhere. ... take the NHS ... It doesn't matter that no other country in Europe has an NHS and almost all of them deliver better healthcare to their citizens. ... to make sure that people have better healthcare ... you offend against what is politically correct. ... The problem is that although political correctness began in the 1970s as a form of radical Left wing politics [stemming from USSR backed opposition to America's involvement in Vietnam, and from Bernstein and Woodward's Washington Post saturation coverage of Nixon's misjudgement in permitting a bungled raid on Democratic Party lawyers at Watergate] and was at that time little more than the preserve of students, one generation's students are the next generation's establishment. So the mindset of 1970s students ended up becoming the mindset of the establishment ... Political correctness is now the dominant mindset in public life. ...
"Look at the BBC. Its editors would say that they are open-minded and curious, free of bias and always interested in ideas. But try this ... Imagine a drama series on the BBC where the hero was a Brexit [anti-EU dictatorship] campaigner or a Trump supporter. You can't, can you? Or how about a BBC documentary which suggested immigration is out of control? Again, you can't.
"Of course, the BBC would never dream of such programmes because they offend political correctness ... Indeed, Trevor Phillips [former chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission] recalls in his film [about political correctness blunders, not shown on the BBC, 23 February 2017] how he was accused by a well-known BBC Radio 4 broadcaster of 'peddling a racist narrative' after he said that President Obama's iconic status as the first African-American president shouldn't be allowed to mask his poor record in office. This kind of political correctness that censors offending views and refuses to allow the discussion of certain topics is very dangerous. First, because human beings evolve through intellectual inquiry and endeavour. If we simply block off some ideas and views, then we diminish ourselves [the way to debunk claims by holocaust deniers or Moon landing conspiracy theorists is with a discussion of the factual evidence, not by simplistic censorship or dictatorial abuse]. But more immediately, because a society that treats the concerns and values of many of its people as simply beyond the pale and seeks to wipe them from view is headed for trouble."
- Stephen Pollard, This Country Has Been Taken Over by the PC Brigade, Daily Express, 24 February 2017, page 12.
The next page, page 13, has another example of this problem, written by Frederick Forsyth, Nobody in Britain is above Criticism (Daily Express, 24 February 2017), where a fashion-bigoted, critic-intolerant judge who made a mistake is trying to impose censorship to preserve his dignity:
"The great and good Lord Neuberger, president of the Supreme Court, is not pleased ... He has been contradicted, even criticised. ... But the noble lord does not like being disagreed with let alone criticised so he took to the airwaves ... no one in this old country is immune from criticism and that goes right up to the monarch, and she is a lot higher than Lord Neuberger. Our forefathers fought many tyrants for the right to speak our minds ... So if the noble lord ever felt like redecorating his robing room let me recommend a large placard at one end saying: 'Every mouthful you eat, every stitch on your back, every cup of petrol in your limousine is paid by us. So please do not treat us with disdain. Signed, the people of the UK'." [The problem here is that the judge would simply reply: "I pay tax too, therefore I pay my own salary! Now get lost, before I have judge you guilty of incitement of hatred, high treason, racism, rudeness, lack of respect, and political incorrectness!]
There is a deeper truth that these journalists are missing. All forms of dictatorship can invent some contrived excuse to fail to engage into a constructive discussion with critics to make progress. The usual claim that all criticisms of judges, lawyers, priests, political ideologies, physics theories, or religions is a "hate crime" that must be censored as rude, and that only nice, polite praise of orthodoxy is acceptable, is a dictatorial counter-revolutionary trick: the opposite of free liberalism.
UPDATE: 25 February 2017
ABOVE: Leo McKinstry's analysis, How government gave compensation to suicide bomber, Daily Express, 23 February 2017, page 12:
"The warped ideology of political correctness is fuelling the demise of the West, making a mockery of justice. In the madhouse built by our ruling elite ... we are literally paying our enemies to wage their brutal war against our civilization. ... Abu Zakariya al-Britani ... was reported to have blown himself up in a suicide attack on an Iraqi army base near Mosul ... not just a terrorist but also the recipient of a reported £1 million from the British taxpayer. This vast sum was handed to him by our supine politicians ... for alleged mistreatment while he was held in the US detention camp of Guantanamo Bay, having been arrested in 2001 by US forces ... the Labour government lobbied hard for his release, which soon took place in 2004.
"When he was freed ... the Home Secretary David Blunkett grandly declared that 'no one who is returned will be a threat to the security of the British people'. That empty boast now lies flattened ... Altogether 16 people from Britain received handouts after spells in Guantanamo, with the total sum estimated to be £20 million. ... our sick system means that people such as him are lavishly rewarded. Hatred of our values is the cue for riches. ... They despise our gullibility dressed up as compassion and our cowardice masquerading as tolerance. ...
"Lenin famously described his Western supporters as 'useful idiots' ... the civil rights lobby led by the sanctimonious Shami Chakrabarti [now a Labour Lady and British shadow Attorney General, a close colleague of labour leader Jerry Corbyn] of the pressure group Liberty, who built a public career out of shrieking against anti-terrorist crack-downs before she became one of Jeremy Corbyn's acolytes. Typically, when al-Harith was released in 2004, she said she was 'delighted', even though the American authorities had said ... that he was 'a known Al Queda operative' who represented 'a threat to the USA, its interests and allies'. ... The new US President Trump also recognises this. That is why he and his new Attorney General Jeff Sessions are determined to keep Guantanamo Bay open as they strengthen America's counter-terrorism policy."
The Marxists are hypocrites and fakers, haters of free speech yet disguised as liberals, haters of differences yet disguised as anti-racists, haters of individualism yet disguised as tolerant, haters of progress yet disguised as progressives, haters of understanding and hope yet disguised as compassionate people. This is why they exploit and facilitate the "divide and rule" tactics of Lenin: race war, cultural war, religious war, class war. They are obsessed with creating divisions, opposing improvements, and facilitating terrorism because their dogma is one of fear, violence and destruction.
Update, 2 March 2017:
It has been pointed out to me that the UK House of Commons Speaker, John Bercow, who has stated that he refuses to permit President Trump address Parliament during his state visit later this year, backed the £1 million UK government funding of IS suicide bomber Jamal Al Harith and others after their release by Labour Home Secretary Jack Straw on 25 January 2005. Speaking in the Commons, Bercow stated:
"Would it now send an invaluable signal if the foreign secretary instead of simply saying, 'If people come to us about compensation we will follow it up', 'There is no reason in principle why they should not receive compensation and every reason why they should'?"
Labour MPs Keith Vaz and Jeremy Corbyn joined Bercow in demanding compensation for these Guantanamo Bay terrorist suspects. Jeremy Corbyn stated complacently in 2013 that the terrorists compensated were to be praised: "the British nationals who have been released from Guantanamo Bay ... in fact, have made a commendable contribution to arguments for justice and for closing it down." How wrong he was proved when Al Harith blew himself and others up in Iraq last month! He has failed to apologise or retract his false statements, just as he ignores the full facts about civil defence effectiveness and the deterrence needed against terrorists. In the past, Corbyn has made a point of being friendly to IRA bombers and has praised Hama terrorists. That's his "compassion".
UPDATE ON WHY ANTI NUCLEAR DETERRENCE BIGOTS CENSOR THEIR OPPONENTS INSTEAD OF ENGAGING IN HONEST DISCUSSIONS: 24 FEBRUARY 2017
There is another analysis of the use of bigotry dressed up as "taking offense at other people's views" by Stephen Pollard out today: This Country Has Been Taken Over by the PC Brigade, Daily Express, 24 February 2017, page 12, which is vital for understanding how and why groupthink "liberal elite"-camouflaged fascists get away with ignoring the substance of the argument (which debunks their agenda of dogmatic Marxism, socialism, or whatever). If you hold a political garbage belief that you cannot honestly defend by reasoned argument, then you act as a bigot by censoring out all alternative, more defensible ideas as being immoral.
This was the way the medieval Catholic Church, the USSR Stalinist's and Goebbels' Nazis propaganda machine worked: they were paranoid, claiming that all their critics were racist infidel, a trick still used by Marxists against Jews and Western capitalists. Socialists claimed they were fighting back against anti-Aryan, or anti-Russian bigotry when they starved, beat and gassed millions. Then concentration camp eugenics was deemed the only way to stop anti-Aryan or anti-Russian "racism". By simplistically and falsely dressing up any criticism as being simply "rude" or "racist", this "shoot the messenger" card was used to protect socialist ideology from reform (rudeness is used by Marxists whenever it suits their agenda to rant and rave and scream, to divert themselves from the task of honest debate, and because someone has been angered or embittered by dogmatic authority doesn't by itself prove their criticisms to be wrong):
"Political correctness has become a poison ... it destroys ordinary people's faith in the system by treating their genuine and decent concerns as somehow immoral. And when people no longer feel that mainstream politics and the system can reflect their values, then they look elsewhere. ... take the NHS ... It doesn't matter that no other country in Europe has an NHS and almost all of them deliver better healthcare to their citizens. ... to make sure that people have better healthcare ... you offend against what is politically correct. ... The problem is that although political correctness began in the 1970s as a form of radical Left wing politics [stemming from USSR backed opposition to America's involvement in Vietnam, and from Bernstein and Woodward's Washington Post saturation coverage of Nixon's misjudgement in permitting a bungled raid on Democratic Party lawyers at Watergate] and was at that time little more than the preserve of students, one generation's students are the next generation's establishment. So the mindset of 1970s students ended up becoming the mindset of the establishment ... Political correctness is now the dominant mindset in public life. ...
"Look at the BBC. Its editors would say that they are open-minded and curious, free of bias and always interested in ideas. But try this ... Imagine a drama series on the BBC where the hero was a Brexit [anti-EU dictatorship] campaigner or a Trump supporter. You can't, can you? Or how about a BBC documentary which suggested immigration is out of control? Again, you can't.
"Of course, the BBC would never dream of such programmes because they offend political correctness ... Indeed, Trevor Phillips [former chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission] recalls in his film [about political correctness blunders, not shown on the BBC, 23 February 2017] how he was accused by a well-known BBC Radio 4 broadcaster of 'peddling a racist narrative' after he said that President Obama's iconic status as the first African-American president shouldn't be allowed to mask his poor record in office. This kind of political correctness that censors offending views and refuses to allow the discussion of certain topics is very dangerous. First, because human beings evolve through intellectual inquiry and endeavour. If we simply block off some ideas and views, then we diminish ourselves [the way to debunk claims by holocaust deniers or Moon landing conspiracy theorists is with a discussion of the factual evidence, not by simplistic censorship or dictatorial abuse]. But more immediately, because a society that treats the concerns and values of many of its people as simply beyond the pale and seeks to wipe them from view is headed for trouble."
- Stephen Pollard, This Country Has Been Taken Over by the PC Brigade, Daily Express, 24 February 2017, page 12.
The next page, page 13, has another example of this problem, written by Frederick Forsyth, Nobody in Britain is above Criticism (Daily Express, 24 February 2017), where a fashion-bigoted, critic-intolerant judge who made a mistake is trying to impose censorship to preserve his dignity:
"The great and good Lord Neuberger, president of the Supreme Court, is not pleased ... He has been contradicted, even criticised. ... But the noble lord does not like being disagreed with let alone criticised so he took to the airwaves ... no one in this old country is immune from criticism and that goes right up to the monarch, and she is a lot higher than Lord Neuberger. Our forefathers fought many tyrants for the right to speak our minds ... So if the noble lord ever felt like redecorating his robing room let me recommend a large placard at one end saying: 'Every mouthful you eat, every stitch on your back, every cup of petrol in your limousine is paid by us. So please do not treat us with disdain. Signed, the people of the UK'." [The problem here is that the judge would simply reply: "I pay tax too, therefore I pay my own salary! Now get lost, before I have judge you guilty of incitement of hatred, high treason, racism, rudeness, lack of respect, and political incorrectness!]
There is a deeper truth that these journalists are missing. All forms of dictatorship can invent some contrived excuse to fail to engage into a constructive discussion with critics to make progress. The usual claim that all criticisms of judges, lawyers, priests, political ideologies, physics theories, or religions is a "hate crime" that must be censored as rude, and that only nice, polite praise of orthodoxy is acceptable, is a dictatorial counter-revolutionary trick: the opposite of free liberalism.
UPDATE: 25 February 2017
ABOVE: Leo McKinstry's analysis, How government gave compensation to suicide bomber, Daily Express, 23 February 2017, page 12:
"The warped ideology of political correctness is fuelling the demise of the West, making a mockery of justice. In the madhouse built by our ruling elite ... we are literally paying our enemies to wage their brutal war against our civilization. ... Abu Zakariya al-Britani ... was reported to have blown himself up in a suicide attack on an Iraqi army base near Mosul ... not just a terrorist but also the recipient of a reported £1 million from the British taxpayer. This vast sum was handed to him by our supine politicians ... for alleged mistreatment while he was held in the US detention camp of Guantanamo Bay, having been arrested in 2001 by US forces ... the Labour government lobbied hard for his release, which soon took place in 2004.
"When he was freed ... the Home Secretary David Blunkett grandly declared that 'no one who is returned will be a threat to the security of the British people'. That empty boast now lies flattened ... Altogether 16 people from Britain received handouts after spells in Guantanamo, with the total sum estimated to be £20 million. ... our sick system means that people such as him are lavishly rewarded. Hatred of our values is the cue for riches. ... They despise our gullibility dressed up as compassion and our cowardice masquerading as tolerance. ...
"Lenin famously described his Western supporters as 'useful idiots' ... the civil rights lobby led by the sanctimonious Shami Chakrabarti [now a Labour Lady and British shadow Attorney General, a close colleague of labour leader Jerry Corbyn] of the pressure group Liberty, who built a public career out of shrieking against anti-terrorist crack-downs before she became one of Jeremy Corbyn's acolytes. Typically, when al-Harith was released in 2004, she said she was 'delighted', even though the American authorities had said ... that he was 'a known Al Queda operative' who represented 'a threat to the USA, its interests and allies'. ... The new US President Trump also recognises this. That is why he and his new Attorney General Jeff Sessions are determined to keep Guantanamo Bay open as they strengthen America's counter-terrorism policy."
The Marxists are hypocrites and fakers, haters of free speech yet disguised as liberals, haters of differences yet disguised as anti-racists, haters of individualism yet disguised as tolerant, haters of progress yet disguised as progressives, haters of understanding and hope yet disguised as compassionate people. This is why they exploit and facilitate the "divide and rule" tactics of Lenin: race war, cultural war, religious war, class war. They are obsessed with creating divisions, opposing improvements, and facilitating terrorism because their dogma is one of fear, violence and destruction.
Update, 2 March 2017:
"Would it now send an invaluable signal if the foreign secretary instead of simply saying, 'If people come to us about compensation we will follow it up', 'There is no reason in principle why they should not receive compensation and every reason why they should'?"
Labour MPs Keith Vaz and Jeremy Corbyn joined Bercow in demanding compensation for these Guantanamo Bay terrorist suspects. Jeremy Corbyn stated complacently in 2013 that the terrorists compensated were to be praised: "the British nationals who have been released from Guantanamo Bay ... in fact, have made a commendable contribution to arguments for justice and for closing it down." How wrong he was proved when Al Harith blew himself and others up in Iraq last month! He has failed to apologise or retract his false statements, just as he ignores the full facts about civil defence effectiveness and the deterrence needed against terrorists. In the past, Corbyn has made a point of being friendly to IRA bombers and has praised Hama terrorists. That's his "compassion".
